When reality and perception diverge,
institutions fail quietly first.
Drift Systems builds private systemic risk diagnostics for institutions operating under deep uncertainty. Current domains include decentralised finance, AI infrastructure, and complex capital systems.
Drift Systems identifies systemic drift — the growing gap between what organisations believe is true and what their operating environment actually reflects. This divergence accumulates across data, incentives, narratives, and governance until failure becomes inevitable.
We diagnose risk by identifying structural incompatibilities — futures that cannot coexist inside the same system.
We exist to make that divergence visible early — while correction is still possible.
Current status
Drift Systems operates in limited circulation.
Outputs are shared selectively with institutions and governance actors as diagnostic artefacts, not marketed products.
Public case studies and endorsements are intentionally absent.
What we mean by drift
Drift occurs when decisions rely on signals that no longer correspond to reality, even though they remain internally coherent.
How drift forms
Formation
- Metrics optimise appearance, not truth
- Incentives reward alignment over accuracy
- Narratives outrun evidence
- Provenance becomes opaque
Concealment
- Reports remain “green”
- Dashboards stay populated
- Confidence rises as signal quality drops
- Dissent appears irrational
Who this is for
Institutions & Boards
Governance stress, accountability gaps, and forced decisions.
AI Labs & Technology Teams
Model lineage, evaluation drift, and perception risk.
What Drift Systems is not
- No prediction of the future
- No reassurance without evidence
- No conversion of weak signals into strong claims
For confidential institutional enquiries, see the enquiry page.